Originally Posted by Kaizer Sauze
But to actively pursue the services of someone who's directly related to Murdoch is beyond the pale for me.
|
The majority of fans are happy to actively pursue the services of murdoch let alone someone related to them when they purchase SKY TV, is their not enough you can have a go at them for without trying to push it to the extremes watering down the argument in the process?
The S*n is the boycott, beyond that it's down to personal preference many supporters read the NotW and the Times/Sunday Times, pay for Sky TV, use My Space, have watched Fox News, Watch the sunday supplement despite it being sponsored by The S*n
Personally I don't buy the S*n or NotW but do watch Sky, Have read the Times, have watched Fox channels, have looked on My Space, and watched the Sunday Supplement despite the S*n adverts.
It may be hypocritical to boycott those two and watch/read the rest but then what can I do, to me the S*n is up their and it's links with the NotW are clear, the rest is tenuous at best.
If that means myself and thousands of other supporters are 'beyond the pale' then so be it.