Thread: SOS Statement
View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 23rd April 2008, 02:08 AM
theRedHorse theRedHorse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,938
vCash: 500
theRedHorse is about to join Soccer Saturday's panel of 'experts'theRedHorse is about to join Soccer Saturday's panel of 'experts'
Re: SOS Statement

Originally Posted by real red View Post
I was referring in particular to your "who gives a shit / dog eat dog" comment and how it related to my original point. Still...

Here's an example of the blame going to the wrong person anyway -

Liverpool fans make their point over new stadium - Liverpool Daily Post.co.uk



But....

icLiverpool - LFC buyers back £215m New Anfield



That's not an attack on Neil either, but it was the first example that came into my head. As I say, it's easy on a forum to get away with not checking stuff, but it's a bit more serious if it's on behalf of something like SoS.

Everyone at the club seems to mention lawyers these days too, so there's another reason to be wary of misquoting anyone.
Meh...

Originally Posted by real red View Post
I wonder if Rick Parry's actually answered any calls from his lawyers about the letter?
Feel free to elaborate mate. Don't talk about others not being transparent enough and then throwing cryptic shit out like that. Again.
Reply With Quote