[isr]

Originally Posted by Rashid

A) Chris Bascombe and Dave Usher have said so, and I trust them. A journalist I know who knows Hicks well, also told me that Rafa if he had to choose would go with Hicks now.

So its all just rumours and whispers. A whispers to B, who mentions it to C, who says it to D. D tells E, who then jumps online, and screams it out loud to the whole world. F reads what E wrote, and repeats it like gospel.

Pretty soon, its established fact, and every fan is now encouraged to demand Rafa's dismissal because he's in bed with Hicks.

Surely you can see by now what is so wrong and downright despicable about this. Surely.

Originally Posted by Rashid

I don't know why this is ot if it is 100% true but I think there may be something in it given that Parry favours DIC and Rafa has been critical of Parry in the past.

So you're not sure, but you repeat it as if it was a fact, on numerous occasions, on numerous threads. Sometimes ending with demands for Rafa's head.

With the added "proof" that Rafa is critical of Parry. Of course, any fan who has been critical of Parry in the past must be suspected of sympathies with Hicks. Know any fans who fit that bill?



I apologise in advance for being a pedantic ass. But I'm going to repeat my questions. As they have still not been answered.

Originally Posted by isr

So, I would like to ask:
a) how do you know for a fact that Rafa is IN Hicks camp?
b) what part has Rafa played in ensuring that Hicks retains control of Liverpool?
c) what possible impact can Rafa make on the takeover saga, and if so, why hasn't he done it.

I share your frustrations Rashid, but I would genuinely like to know what Rafa has done to bolster Hicks. If you, Dave, or anyone could address the above 3 questions, I would be better informed.

I'm still waiting for ANYONE (including, but not only Rashid) who has repeatedly stated that Rafa is in Hick's camp to please answer the above.

The challenge remains in place .....