[fowler239119]

This might not be strictly in line with whats getting discussed on this thread but I just had a couple of thoughts related to this whole affair and wondered what people thought?

If Moores really is as greedy and uncaring as some people make out (and this is where as an OTT I am a little lost as my perception of him was based on the offal website and official publications and I never really came across much among supporters suggesting he didn't have the best intenetions of the club at heart until this all blew up,clearly there was alraedy a greater mix of feelings about him on Merseyside).. Surely he would have been aware of the fact that the club was worth so much more than he sold it for? It must be impossible for a businessman who would have all the various experts looking at the situation, to undervalue an asset by so much?!!

unless he wasnt really all that focused on screwing money out of the deal??

ok so the new value in based on the fact we will have a bigger stadium but Moores knew that when he was selling,in fact with no real advances made in building it the Yanks are (hopefuly) selling the same asset for almost double. I mean look at how much can be squeezed out of DIC compared to the amount Moores accepted? Or am I missing something??

Secondly I know that supporters will be judging DIC with much more caution in terms of their promises, ethics and the main thing for all of us at the moment is getting the Yanks out.. but in terms of efficency and business sense you would imagine that Rick Pary himself was behind their whole bid. I mean is the potential 100m H&G walk away with what could have been spent on transfers last summer? Because if the are going to treat us a business (which everyone seems to agree they are) it will be a while before the earn that 100 mill back if they plan on running the club the way we want them too. So should we not still shitting that were going to be worse off than when Moores was in charge?