Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinSweden
I would be happier having them with 49% than Gillett holding on to his 50%.
|
If Hicks gets 51%, he can effectively get rid of Moores and Parry and put the entire debt on the club if he wants to.
Also Bond has reported that DIC will be buying Gillett's equity with £40m cash. Does this mean they will get the 49% of the loan transferred to their name? If this is the case, what is the difference between G&H or Hicks/DIC?
DIC buying 49% just doesn't make sense.