Thread: Hicks moves for complete control of Liverpool
View Single Post
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 29th February 2008, 05:49 PM
aws's Avatar
aws aws is offline
TLW Consigliere
  
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On a mattress, NYC.
Posts: 13,016
vCash: 500
iTrader: (0)
aws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimersaws rules harder than the Proclaimers
Re: Hicks moves for complete control of Liverpool
Originally Posted by spider-neil View Post
can anyone answer if he can do what he says he can do (block the move).
I have shares so I know for a fact when a shareholder wants to sell they have to offer existing shareholders first option but I don't know if existing shareholders can block a move once the shares have been offered and not taken or if someone (other than an existing sharehold) offers more money for the shares.

facts please not opinion I'm curious.
depends entirely on what their shareholder agreement says

Very unlikely that he has a complete veto
__________________
You're taking this too personally, Sonny!
Reply With Quote